by Dave Hunt

   Before the cross of Christ, mankind was divided into two groups: Jews and Gentiles.  The Old  and New Testaments both make very clear what caused this distinction: it was the covenants God had  made with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and with their descendants through Moses.  These covenants were  for Israel alone and separated her from all other nations on the face of the earth, making God's "chosen  people" absolutely unique. Israel was segregated from other peoples by the Mosaic law and by her special  relationship with the One who calls Himself "the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob."

   The important distinction between Jews and Gentiles is maintained consistently throughout the  Bible: "...so shall we be separated, I and thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth"  (Ex.33:16); "...for I the Lord am holy, and have severed you from other people that ye should be mine"  (Lev. 20:26); "And what one nation in the earth is like thy people Israel, whom God went to redeem to be  his ... own people forever" (II Chron.17:21-22);  ... ye (Gentiles) were without Christ, being aliens from  the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without  God ..." (Eph.2:11-12).

   After the cross a new entity came into existence -- the church that Jesus Christ promised He  would build (Matt. 16:18).  As a result, there are now three divisions of mankind: Jews, Gentiles and the  church.  Paul tells us that we are to "Give none offense, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the  church of God" (I Cor. 10:32).  It is absolutely essential to understand that these three groups exist side- by-side in todays world, to distinguish between them, and to recognize that God deals with each  differently

   Essential also is an understanding that the church was created through offering to both Jews and  Gentiles a "new covenant" relationship with God.  This did not bring Gentiles under the Jewish Mosaic  Law (as some erroneously teach), but delivered from it those coming into the church, both Jews and  Gentiles.  Paul explains that Gentiles who were "aliens ... of  Israel, and strangers from the covenants of  promise" have been "made nigh(to God) by the blood of Christ."  God has "broken down the middle wall  of partition(between Jew and Gentile); having abolished in his flesh the (Mosaic) law of commandments  contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain(Jew and Gentile) one new man" (Eph. 2:11- 22).

   These Scriptures(and many others) make it clear that the church did not replace Israel, but came  into existence as a new and third entity comprised of both Jews and Gentiles and distinct from each.  As  surely as Gentiles continue to exist outside the church, so does Israel with all of God's promises and plans  for her remaining in full force.  God also has unique plans for the church different from those for either  Israel or the Gentile nations.

   A major error of Reconstructionists such as North, Rushdoony, DeMar and Bahnsen(an error that  is also taught by Jay Grimstead's Coalition on Revival) is their claim that the Law of Moses was for all  mankind; and that it provides the moral basis both for the civil government of Romans 13 and for the  conduct of Christians today.  On the contrary, the law which unsaved civil magistrates enforce under  Romans 13 could not be the Mosaic Law, because that was given exclusively to the Jews.  It is rather the  moral law that Romans 2 says is written by God in every human conscience

   That the Mosaic law was never intended for Gentiles and is not applicable to the church is clear  from many Scriptures in addition to those quoted above, such as: "For what nation is there so great, who  hath God so nigh unto them ... (and) hath statutes and judgments so righteous as all this law" (Deut. 4:7- 8); "He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel.  He hath not dealt so with  any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them"(Ps. 147:19-20)  As already noted, the  Mosaic "law of commandments" that distinguished Israel from the rest of the world was "abolished" by  the cross of  Christ in the process of creating the church out of Jews and Gentiles who have been made  into "one new man."

   Failure to accept the above teaching of Scripture leads to grievous errors which plagued the early  church and are being revived today.  Foremost, of course, is legalism -- the idea that to be a Christian one  must obey the laws of Moses.   This causes confusion both as to justification and sanctification: the means  of being delivered from sin's future penalty, and from its present power in our lives.  The Scripture  makes  it clear that neither of these involves keeping the law.  The suggestion of "Judaizers", that the church was  under the Mosaic Law, was rejected as heresy by the apostles and elders when they met in Jerusalem  specifically to consider this subject shortly after Pentecost (Acts 15). Paul thoroughly refuted the Judaizers'  teaching in his Epistle to the Galatians

   Certainly through keeping the law "there shall no flesh be justified" (Rom.3:20). Justification comes  as a free gift of God's grace through the finished work of Christ. Nor can one be sanctified (i.e. gain the  victory over the practice of sin) by keeping the law, because of the weakness of human flesh. The good news  is that "what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh," God accomplished through "sending  his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin" (Rom.8:1-4). The New Testament presents to the  Christian a much higher standard of moral and ethical conduct than that of the Mosaic Law. And we are empowered  to live this higher standard because Christ Himself, by the Holy Spirit, has come to indwell our hearts and to  live through us a supernatural life pleasing to God. The glorious result is the death of self and a new life  of faith (Gal.2:20) that produces the fruit of the Spirit (Gal.5:22-23)

   There are many serious consequences to the growing delusion that the church is Israel. Christ  said that those who "call themselves Jews and are not" are in fact "the synagogue of Satan"(Rev. 2:9;3:9)!   Some of those who teach this lie are brilliant, such as Greg Bahnsen, who holds his doctorate in  philosophy from USC. Yet the errors they make are so elementary as to betray a basic anti-Jewish  sentiment, which they deny, but which seems to have blinded them to the obvious. Bahnsen, for example,  quotes Ps. 89:34 ("My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.") to prove  his contention that "God's covenant is one unchanging moral code through Old & New Testaments" (By  This Standard, p.44). Yet Psalm 89 has nothing whatsoever to do with a moral code but is all about the  covenant God made with David that "His seed shall endure for ever, & his throne as the sun before me"  (v.36). This is the covenant the angel Gabriel reaffirmed in telling Mary that the One conceived in her of  the Holy Spirit would reign on the throne of His father David, a covenant which Bahnsen perversely  claims is no longer in force in spite of the very verse he misapplies declaring that it is!

   Bahnsen habitually quotes Jesus' statement, "... one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the  law ..."to support his contention that the church is under the Mosaic Law, but deliberately leaves out the  rest of the sentence. Far from teaching that the law would always be in force, Christ declared that it would  pass away when it was fulfilled, and that He had come to fulfill it: "I am not come to destroy [the law], but  to fulfill [it]. ... one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled" (Matt. 5:17-l8).  His life, death, burial and resurrection accomplished this fulfillment and made possible the new covenant  relationship with God where by those in the church are "justified by faith without the deeds of law" (Rom.  3:21-30).  Does this "make void the law"? No, it "establish[es] the law" (v.31) as that which made, Israel  unique, was the barrier between Jew and Gentile, is still applicable to Jews, but for those now in the  church, both Jews and Gentiles, has been fulfilled and abolished in Christ. 

   Those who teach that the church is Israel go on to claim that the church is heir to all of the  promises given to Israel. This is as ludicrous as claiming that "the land of Israel" is now "the land of the  church." Clearly the church has no relationship to the land God gave to Israel. Hear God's promise: "...  though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee  ... He that scattered Israel will gather him ... they shall come and sing in the height of Zion ... they shall  not sorrow any more at all" (Jer.30:10-11;31:3-14;etc.). 

   The preservation of the Israelis as an identifiable people, in spite of the proverbial "wandering  Jews" 2500-year diaspora from the promised land, and the establishment of Israel in 1948, constitute  irrefutable proof for the existence of the "God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" and the validity of His Holy  Word. Therefore, to insist that Israel no longer has any claim to her ancient homeland, and that her return  thereto is a mere coincidence, denies one of the most persuasive arguments for belief in God and the  Gospel, dishonors Him and His Word, and is not only illogical but evil!

   My language may seem strong, but it is justified in view of the monstrous errors that grow from  this one delusion, as well as by the severity of Christ's "synagogue of Satan" indictment. It may seem  innocent enough to claim for the church II Chron. 7:14, but this Scripture that has become such a popular  favorite simply does not apply to the church. While Christians may make spiritual applications to  themselves from God's admonition to Israel to "humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn  from their wicked way," the "land" He promised to heal as a result was Israel and only lsrael, not the  United States or any other country.

   Gary North's latest book, When Justice is Aborted, begins with God's promise to Joshua that He  would help him to conquer the land of Canaan--then, in a typical Reconstruction/Kingdom/ Domin-ion  misapplication of Scripture, on that basis justifies a Christian takeover of the world. The Forceful Men  organization, co-directed by muscleman John Jacobs, recently sponsored a large conference in Phoenix  featuring leading Charismatic speakers, who promoted the same error. God's exhortation to Joshua to "go  in and possess the land [of Canaan] was presented as inspiration and justification for a "Joshua  generation" of macho-minded Christians taking over America and the world. In fact, Joshua himself had  no authority from God to take over any land outside of the prescribed boundaries specifically given to  Israel. (Gen.15:18-21; Num.34:l-12;etc.)

   The Second Coming of Christ becomes clouded in confusion if we fail to remember that the Lord  comes in a different and specific manner for "Jews, Gentiles and the church of God." For His bride He  comes secretly to "rapture" her to His Father's house of many mansions where He has prepared an eternal  dwelling place for her. For Israel, in the midst of God's judgment for her rejection of her Messiah,  surrounded by the armies of the world and about to be destroyed, He comes visibly in power to rescue her,  judge her Gentile enemies, and to establish the Millennial kingdom with headquarters in Jerusalem. May  God help us to "love His appearing" and to witness with a clear voice concerning these soon coming  events

Reprinted with permission of the Berean Call Ministry P.O. Box 7019 Bend, OR 97708  www.thebereancall.org